NOT QUITE WHAT YOU WERE LOOKING FOR? TRY OUR SEARCH BOX:

Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in comments
Search in excerpt
Search in posts
Search in pages
Search in groups
Search in users
Search in forums
Filter by Custom Post Type
Filter by Categories
Accidents and Incidents
Alan Quilley
Balconies and Balustrades
Bill Sims
Communication and Consultation
Compliance
Construction Safety
Contractor Safety Management
Creativity
Dangerous Goods
Doug Wakefield
Electrical Safety
Emergencies
Ergonomics
Fatigue
Fire Safety
Free Safety Stuff
Gabrielle Carlton
George Robotham
Hazards
Health
Humble Inquiry
Investigation
Lead and Lag Indicators
Leadership
Learning
Manual Handling
Mining Safety
Online Safety
Peter Ribbe
Phil LaDuke
Positive Safety Stuff
Potato Head
PPE
Product Liability
Psychology of Safety and Risk
Public Liability
Relationships
Risk Assessment
Risk Assessment Templates
Risk Aversion
Risk Homeostasis
Risk Management
Road Safety
Rob Sams
Robert Long
Robert Long
Safe Behaviours
Safe Driving
Safe Sex
Safety Blogs
Safety Books
Safety Books
Safety Culture
Safety Humor
Safety Incentives
Safety Induction
Safety Leadership
Safety Legislation
Safety Management Plan
Safety News
Safety Photos
Safety Pictures
Safety Procedures
Safety Professional
Safety Satire
Safety Signs
Safety Slogans & Pictures
Safety Software
Safety Statistics
Safety systems
Safety Training
Safety Videos
Semiotics
Simplistic Safety
Slips Trips and Falls
Stress
Talking Risk
Technology
Tony Dundon
Toolbox Talks
Uncategorized
Work Method Statements
Workers Compensation
Workplace Safety
Zero Harm

Safety Gets Dumber

by Dave Collins on March 7, 2014 · 6 comments

in Risk Aversion,Safety Photos,Safety Pictures



Safety Gets Dumber

hilton

Another one for our HOT TOASTER PAGE.

This sign was photographed by a reader in the room of a major city Hotel. I know that some people are concerned about picking up nasties like tinea and planters warts from public showers. When I was in the Army we showered in thongs (flip flops). I am assuming that there have been slip and fall incidents in this Hotel (probably not many) and this sign is the knee-jerk reaction of an over zealous and non-thinking safety person. Is putting up a sign like this really effective? The people who are so concerned about the risk to their health from disease are going to ignore the risk of slipping and falling (and the sign). This sign is only going to annoy and offend the vast majority of the Hotel’s Guests. If a Hotel shower is cleaned properly on a daily basis then the risk of disease spread is probably zero. Perhaps a better sign would be something like “Our Hotel rooms are thoroughly cleaned on a daily basis – have a fun and healthy stay with us”??????

This picture is going straight to our HOT TOASTER PAGE.

Please send us photos of safety getting dumber that you come across on your travels: admin@safetyrisk.com.au

This equally condescending sign was posted in a holiday resort – so have their guests never taken a shower?

1497350_10203134593595097_380727610_n



  • Mark

    It’s all an attempted ass covering…the only fear of risk is the risk of being sued.

  • http://www.humandymensions.com Rob Long

    I find this preoccupation with the least important control of risk fascinating. It simply continues to perpetuate the industry’s preoccupation and identification with pettiness and blindsidedness to the humanization of safety and risk.

  • Rod

    PPE was considered effective 25 years ago so it must be effective now and no need to review.

  • http://www.ciws.com.au Mark Jentsch

    On a more serious note – and in line with contemporary legislation – how do we still explain the proliferation of mandated PPE signs on work sites. Aren’t we ever tempted to say “Steel cap boots; show me your risk assessment where this is an identified control!” “Hearing protection; what else have you done to mitigate the generation of noise?”

    I don’t have an issue with Hi-Viz as a uniform policy, but is it really a risk control?

    I recall a road construction site in Perth a year or so ago. Orange barrier mesh everywhere. The on-site uniform was top to toe Hi-Viz orange. The uniforms camouflage effect against the background was outstanding.

    The toaster signs and hot water signs are obviously the results of over zealous ‘risk’ management. On the contrary. aren’t the PPE signs the result of poor risk management?

    My two bob’s worth.

    • http://www.safetyrisk.net Dave Collins

      Totally agree mate. Read a few articles recently about how hi viz has now become invisible as we are so well adapted to it – same as if you live near a train track you dont hear the trains? PPE use has just evolved unquestioned. I dont know of any legislation that mandates specific items in general workplaces – the old Mines Act used to mandate steel caps but that was still at the discretion of the Mine Manager from memory. I visited a construction project recently, never went anywhere near the worksite but had to wear all the gear – even gloves!!! I also wonder whether the risks of wearing PPE are ever considered with these blanket policies?

  • Rod

    I would reckon the first sign has probably come from legal advice and not so much an over-zealous safety person. impossible to know for sure but i have seen the legal fraternity in action on these types of issues. The second is cost related as I know when I lived in a house that had these I constantly had to tell the kids to stop runjning the hot water as that was as hot as it was going to get. A mate I had who was in the motel game told me that they needed to put signs like this up as the amount of people that would complain about the water temp after the valves were implemented made it necessary. Most times when it was investigated the cold water tap was turned on also. The safety issue of the sign is refering to the reason why the valves were installed in the first place and to be honest I reckon they should be compulsory anyway.

Previous post:

Next post: