What is Safety?

by Dave Collins on July 10, 2014 · 38 comments

in Workplace Safety



What is Safety? The World’s Hardest Question?

I’ve been asked to resurrect this article which did generate some interesting discussion a while back…….. 

This article provides probably the best answer: Safety should not be about Safety

What is Safety?Someone asked me the other day: “What is Safety”? Damn good question…….They say it is critical for most people in deciding where they go, what they buy and what they do, consciously or unconsciously. But I’ve never really thought much about it. Is it just is what it is? If you can answer that question quickly and succinctly then I guess you haven’t thought much about it either! It is bound to be a different thing for different people – Its a bit like asking “what is Love”?

If you are a Safety Manager then what are you managing if it cant be properly measured, understood or defined? Are you managing things (hazards), statistic, systems, behaviours, feelings, thoughts or perceptions? If you are a Zero Harm Manager – do you manage nothing?

Helen Keller once said something like: “Safety is mostly a superstition. It does not exist in nature,  nor do the children of men as a whole experience it. Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. Life is either a daring adventure, or nothing.

Someone once said to me: “Safety is something that happens between your ears, not something you hold in your hands.”

Is safety something you do or part of what you do – drive safely, what does that mean?

Is Safe something that you be – I promise to be safe – that will sound good but what does it really mean?

Is safety something you take – Take safety precautions, take safety seriously?

Is safety something you ensure – Ensure the health and safety of others, how do you do that?

Is Safety a place you go to – The children were taken to safety, is it really safe?

Is Safety a more short-term or external physical thing as opposed to Health?

Is Safety a real thing or do you just feel it – It looks safe, or does it feel safe?

Is Safety something you think or actually are – I’m worried about my safety but am I really safe here?

Is Safety something that just exists when you aren’t in danger – The workplace is safe because it is hazard free?

Are Safety and Danger things that are mutually exclusive or is protection from danger called risk management - I have protection so it will be safe?

Is it something that is always 100% guaranteed as some Zero Harm proponents would believe?

What about when something is called “the safest” or "the safest way" – is that a perception, has worked before or based on fact and data?

Is Safety First or should it be just part of everything we do?

Is Zero Harm the new or better term for Safety? I hope not!

Now I’m totally confused!!!!!!!

In researching this topic I came across a website devoted to the question: www.whatissafety.com/. This is a website for travellers and asks the questions “what is safety for air travellers” and “what is safety for hiker”. They mention that “safe” and “safety” are in the top 2000 words in the English language?? Not much of use there

Let’s look at the definitions of Safety, official or otherwise:

From the most trusted Source, (Wikipedia):

“Safety is the state of being "safe" (from French sauf), the condition of being protected against physical, social, spiritual, financial, political, emotional, occupational, psychological, educational or other types or consequences of failure, damage, error, accidents, harm or any other event which could be considered non-desirable. Safety can also be defined to be the control of recognized hazards to achieve an acceptable level of risk. This can take the form of being protected from the event or from exposure to something that causes health or economical losses. It can include protection of people or of possessions.”

Oxford Dictionary: 

Definition of safety: noun (plural safeties)

1 [mass noun] the condition of being protected from or unlikely to cause danger, risk, or injury: they should leave for their own safety,  the survivors were airlifted to safety

2 [as modifier] denoting something designed to prevent injury or damage: a safety barrier a safety helmet

3 [count noun] North American short for safety catch.

Or, for a simplistic definition from www.Ask.com

“Safety means keeping yourself and others free from harm or danger. It means taking care not to fall or bump or run into things. It also means to avoid accidents by being careful with what you are doing.”

Of course any word so popular and powerful is going to be abused and Rob Long explains in his recent article “Safety Justifies Anything and Everything

Isn’t it strange how the quest for safety is used to justify all range of unethical practice. As long as we put the intention and words of safety in front of some practice or some idea, we are somehow allowed to bully, intimidate, manipulate, overpower and say anything offensive, as long as we speak the sacred unchallenged words of safety.



  • m a z

    I think safety means the work you are going to done make it more risk less then you are safe otherwise you have no safety.Am I right?

  • Rob Long

    One of the most annoying phrases I see all the time is ‘safety is a value’, i’d love to hear an explanation of how safety is a value. Just because you value you something doesn’t mean it is a value. It is amazing how people accept labels and don’t do their homework. People badge things as ‘culture’, ‘innovation’, ‘social psychology’ as was evidenced in a book I read recently and it wasn’t about any of these things. No doubt the non discerning buy the title and think they have the substance.

    • Dave Collins

      Even worse when the value is Zero!

      • Rob Long

        Or further, the value of arrogance cultivated by zero and a cert 4 OHS

    • http://batman-news.com Wynand

      Hi Rob,

      I am answering the post in terms of how I perceive it, and hope you will give an explanation of how this really works. Here goes:

      Safety cannot be a priority, since priorities change. It has to be entrenched in the way we normally behave. It must therefore be something we do because we believe in doing it. This places it in the same category as honesty, integrity, strive for excellence. Since these are all values, it follows that safety must be a value also.

      One of the reasons I like this approach (and I am open to hearing your perspective) is that it separates safety from ranking or prioritising, and putting it in a “category” that suggest it should be part of the integrated whole, and not a separate entity.

      I must confess, since I cannot afford to attend your post-graduate course, I unashamedly use this forum to learn from you as much as possible, and will therefore value any thoughts you share on this topic.

  • Rob L

    Safety, to some is perhaps akin to a superstition, or at most, relative and ephemeral. To misquote Helen Keller, “It does not exist in nature”. Might safety thereby be a state of mind? A point where to go beyond such is then perceived as risk.

    Safety may be the antithesis to genuine risk. Genuine risk, for some, answers a fundamental need that cannot be met through other means – though such can be a poisonous medicine, a drop too much and yer done for.

    To explain what safety means to you, a question a little different to ‘what is’, might be an easier task for words.

    Thanks for the thought-provoking Dave.

    • Dave Collins

      Thanks Rob L – I hadn’t heard of this terminology when I wrote the article but safety is best described as a “wicked problem”!
      Thinking you are safe can in fact mean you are less safe. We all know that an absence of injuries (or zero harm) is not an indicator of safety.

  • Wynand

    Of course, “safety” is also situational. If you are in a war zone and reach a bunker after running through an area exposed to gunfire, you will probably say: “I am safe”. We say “I am home safely” (referring to the exposure of travel risks or sometimes just to the weather like in “safe from the rain”). We talk about a “safe place” to talk, meaning we trust others not to hurt us with what was said in the discussion, we talk about a “safe distance” from a dangerous animal. We also talk about someting is “safe to eat” meaning it is not poisonous, but it can also mean it tastes good, or is not too spicy (again according to the preferences and habits of the eater) or too hot or cold. In the end, it is all relative. (I have a question here – if safety is relative, as I claim, how do you then measure it in absolute terms? Can anything that is defined in relative terms ever be measured in absolute terms?)

    • Dave Collins

      Thanks Wynand, nice to hear from you again! – precisely and therefore how do we justify Zero Harm as the corollary?

  • http://www.humandymensions.com Rob Long

    Maybe safety is a delusional state of mind that believes there is no risk. Or the temporary state of thinking that one won’t die.

  • nilesh narte

    safety means precaution to avoid accident & damages

  • John S

    Safety is “An except able level of Risk”.

  • Chris Keehn

    After all of those wise thoughts, try another idea about defining safety.

    Safety could be defined as having an “ability”. An ability to spend time with family, to play golf badly, to fish often. An ability to make a conscious decision to do or not to do something. Some people have a significant level of the ability and some people need to work hard at developing/maintaining it? Soooo, do we then need to coach/mentor an “ability” to get the best out of it at all levels?? :-)

  • Avinash Karnik

    There is one Sanskrit word which coveys several meanings, which are perhaps relevant.

    योगक्षेम yogakSema m. keeping safe of property
    योगक्षेम yogakSema m. welfare
    योगक्षेम yogakSema m. livelihood
    योगक्षेम yogakSema m. property destined for pious uses and sacrifices
    योगक्षेम yogakSema m. insurance
    योगक्षेम yogakSema m. prosperity
    योगक्षेम yogakSema m. charge for securing property
    योगक्षेम yogakSema m. substance

    http://spokensanskrit.de/index.php?tinput=yogakSema&script=&direction=SE&link=yes

  • http://www.safetyrisk.com.au Dave Collins

    Dammit, I hate people like you who ask questions like that! Now I have to seriously think about the whole philosophy down to its roots!

    But seriously, that’s an excellent question and I am certain that if one of us digs around long enough we’ll find that someone, somewhere earned a PhD trying to answer it. As I am NOT that PhD, I can only give you the prime reason which drives me: I want MY people (anyone in my building or on my property) going home the same way they came in – on their two feet.

    By John Schneider on LinkedIn

  • http://www.letsleepingblogslie.net Shaz

    Safety is being happy and healthy and alert; healthy and alert and happy; alert and happy and healthy, just the mix is different. Shaz.

    • http://www.safetyrisk.com.au Dave Collins

      Someone said to me the other day: “Do you want to be happy or right”?

  • Wynand

    Some more fun descriptions (where I understand “safety” to mean “safer”):
    Safety matches (i.e. two components are needed to strike the match).
    Safety pins (smaller chance of hurting the baby when used for nappies)
    Safety belt (less chance of serious injury)
    Safety shoes

  • Wynand

    In a presentation to post-graduate students I presented “safety” (in inverted commas) as the systems and processes we use to address the “safety” requirements at work, since the more abstract word has too wide a meaning to describe. It remains a difficult concept, but one thing mathematics taught me is that one can define any term and work according to that definition for the rest of the problem. It would therefore make sense to define the term, rather than to try and use a dictionary to use as reference – the reference is just too wide.

    As to Kayakjims’ comment about the “acceptable risk employee” – what do you mean by that? Do you want to replace all risk takers with “zero harm” employees. According to Robert Long’s books, that means you also want to replace all your innovative, creative and thinking employees with risk-averse employees? Getting a “warm and fuzzy feeling” about safety is difficult to achieve, and for me the biggest compliment my colleagues can give me is that I helped them being productive. For me, safety is a result, not a purpose or goal. The purpose is quality work, and high quality work will lead to safety. Why? Because some of the largest components of quality are the same as for safety: Plan, think, pay attention, be proud of the product. “Safety” should be a large part of facilitating the planning process to include best practices to do the job.

  • http://www.safetyrisk.com.au Dave Collins

    The noun “safety” means freedom from danger or lack of danger, according to my dictionary. It means inability to cause harm or damage. That seems to imply that it is absolute, and we all know there 50 shades of gray when it comes to safety. The Thesaurus relates the word to safeness, security, surety, impregnability, invulnerability and such.
    The root word is the noun “safe.” The words safe, save and salvage all come from the Latin “salvua” which means ‘uninjured’. TMI? I think too often we don’t look at the very basis of what we are doing and get caught up in the latest trends and are overwhelmed with so much information that we sometimes can’t determine what is important and what is not. So I applaud Dave for his question.
    By Jim Morrison on LinkedIn

  • http://www.linkedin.com/in/jimodell44 kayakjim

    Great post and comments! Agreed that there is no ‘acceptable’ level of injury or risky work environments. Zero harm, the goal of no incidents may be lofty though again is achievable even if each and every risk factor is not eliminated, even our problem children in the workforce! I guess that would be an acceptable risk if top mgt does not follow their disciplinary action policy then!

    Here’s another go at it…

    What is safety…A morale and ethical responsibility of a company to avoid and remove hazards, and to implement, maintain and fortify training; perform tasks at work or home without injury or illness; inner comfort knowing fellow workers and your loved ones have taken all reasonable precautions.

    • http://www.safetyrisk.com.au Dave Collins

      Thanks James – the “warm, fuzzy feeling” huh? :-)

      • kayakjim

        Warm and fuzzy only happens when the ‘acceptable risk’ employee has left our payroll, Dave ! I only hope they remember something positive regarding their personal safety while under our roof.

  • michael seager

    Interesting question Dave I would think a word like aware comes into it ,being aware of your enviroment and its risks and hazards and being able then to respond appropriately ,being aware when others may put themselves at risk and being able to prevent harm to them , switched on is another term that could be used .

    • http://www.safetyrisk.com.au Dave Collins

      Yeah aware is a good word – but even if everybody is aware there will still be different perceptions about what is safe and what is not, regardless of how many rules there are

  • Henrik

    To me safety is caring
    Be safe! Because I care about you

  • http://www.strategicsheltd.com Jacob Akinala

    As per the Wikipedia definition, it is apparent that safety is a relative term: “Safety is the control of recognized hazards to achieve an acceptable level of risk”. ” Acceptable level of risk” varies from one individual or institution to another. There is also a possibility of some hazards not being recognizable, depending on the tools used to do the HIRA. That’s my take!

    • http://www.safetyrisk.com.au Dave Collins

      Very relative! I just bought a “Safety Razor” to try out – compared to the modern disposables it is not exactly safe but when compared to the old “cut throat” razors I can see how it may have got its name.

  • Wayne McCoy

    Safety means different things to different people in different circumstances. There is never a total absence of risk – there will always be an element of risk so therefore an acceptable level of risk. Again, horses for courses. Different things to different people in different circumstances.

    • http://www.safetyrisk.com.au Dave Collins

      Be a pretty boring life if that werent the case – which is exactly why prescriptive legislation and convoluted safety systems just dont work!

  • Les Henley

    Hi Dave,
    Is zero harm more tangible?
    Zero is an absolute value meaning the absence of …. in this case ‘harm’.
    I certainly realise that zero harm can be measured – up to the point where harm occurs.
    Then there can never be zero again!
    So the term is really meaningless unless there’s NEVER been any harm.
    And what if the harm is not recognised? As in the case of some psycho-social injuries? Or some adverse impact on a person’s psyche.

    • http://www.safetyrisk.com.au Dave Collins

      Noooooooo!!! of course not at all tangible to you and me but to some with a narrow mind it is!!!!

  • Les Henley

    Seriously though – don’t we need to look at the individual variants of the word:
    Safe – being free from risk of harm???
    Safety – a location or condition that is free from risk of harm????
    Safest – the condition of being as free from harm as possible. (As safe as possible)????
    As safe as reasonably practicable – as safe as we can make it given a range of defined constraints.
    NOTE – none of these definitions mean the same as the absence of risk.
    I personally do not believe that safety, or being safe, can be guaranteed 100% because we cannot control the behaviours of individual people or of groups.
    Human behaviour always being the uncontrollable variable and inidvidual tendencies to recognise and/or take more or less risk in a given scenario will always be the weakness.
    Not that I believe in blaming individuals for how they act, at least until we understand WHY they acted.
    A lack of knowledge or experience, to recognise risk or even to control a recognised risk, does not equate to an intention to be usafe.

    • http://www.safetyrisk.com.au Dave Collins

      Agreed mate, Safe(ty) will have a different meaning for all and require different factors to achieve – no “one size fits all” as many and the law would have us believe.

      I think the word(s) just rolls of the tongue, much like love, loved, loveable and loving

  • Richard Forster

    Good stuff Dave – do not bother looking for a definition in the legislation – I mean why would it be there?! I tell participants during training that as I go through life I am greatly reassured that I am still not sure what “safe” actually means but I have a fair idea, in a given situation, of what may be “safer.”

    • http://www.safetyrisk.com.au Dave Collins

      Yeah I think it is all about understanding risk and even that is open to a wide definition. The law cannot possibly define or suggest the safest way in every situation – that is what our brains, intuition and experience are for. The law sometimes creates or shifts the risk to someone or somewhere else.
      As I sit at my desk, I feel safe but have I completely understood all the risks I face, do I really need to or should I be happy with being resonanbly safe? If I over analyse it will that just place undue stress on my feeble brain and create a different type of safety concern – the health kind?

  • Les Henley

    Based on your article, and all the various use and abuse contexts – safety is whatever you ‘need’ it to be. (:p).

    • http://www.safetyrisk.com.au Dave Collins

      Great point Les – probably doesn’t need a definition – it is what is is, or ain’t what it isn’t. Is that the reason why some have attempted to replace it with “Zero Harm” – its something more tangible?

Previous post:

Next post: